Non-RAC Failover Design

From: Nagaraj S <nagaraj.chk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:22:59 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG6s0C32hWM0eVnvqvx2BhJC6HhRZpnu17G+ZoHMq40tvb-TeQ_at_mail.gmail.com>

Good Morning Gurus,

I need help on RAC Vs Non-RAC Failover Design . One of our application need to move out of RAC due to cost factor in this case which HA will be better? I am thinking of OS Failover with Active Passive mechanism. Also help me on Application perspective what are the things I need to check before moving it to NON RAC?

-nagaraj

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Sat Jan 30 2016 - 18:52:59 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nagaraj S: "Re: Non-RAC Failover Design"
Previous message: Martin Klier: "Re: MOS down - urgently need patch 17079301 for Linux x86-64"
Next in thread: Nagaraj S: "Re: Non-RAC Failover Design"
Maybe reply: Nagaraj S: "Re: Non-RAC Failover Design"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message