Re: Oracle licensing...Named User Plus Enterprise Edition Oracle Database.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Ls Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> hi
>
> you have to license 23 developers in every single server, it works like
> you have said, Named User Plus Server licenses
>
> I am pretty sure it works this way because one of my customer was audited
> by LMS, this customer has 1200 NUP accessing around 20 servers, they
> thought NUP can access unlimited servers if the users are in the 1200 NUP
> model, it turns out that it does not work such way
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Johnson, William L (TEIS) <
> WLJohnson_at_te.com> wrote:
>
>> I know there have been many, many threads in the past on Oracle
>> licensing. I still have a question and need some input.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would want to license development databases by Named User Plus for this
>> exercise.
>>
>>
>>
>> I only have 23 developers to license for this exercise. There are no
>> other users, no internet access and no machine accounts connecting – only
>> the 23 developers access the environment.
>>
>>
>>
>> I want licenses for the following landscape that consists of five X86
>> technology servers. Four servers have eight cores and one server has
>> sixteen cores.
>>
>>
>>
>> How many NUP licenses do I need to buy – and why?
>>
>>
>>
>> A: 200 NUP licenses? (16 * 50% * 25)
>>
>> B: 600 NUP licenses? (4 * (8 * 50% * 25) + (16 * 50% * 25))
>>
>> C: Some other number I do not know about…
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the crayon drawing of the landscape…
>>
>> As a side note, I do not wish to license by some strange metric like
>> Named User Plus Server licenses – think Microsoft CAL when thinking
>> about this exercise. The license is called Named User Plus – there is no
>> reference to a server or machine in the title or description of the license.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your thoughts and input.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l