FW: Use the existing RAC. . . or build another one?
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:56:00 +0000
Message-ID: <850425C04FB76547AC0ED12C5F7E0B804151F148_at_HEIMSEAT021.ahc.root.loc>
Something I should have made clear (and thanks to Chris Taylor and Chris Ruel):
Funds are available to either grow the existing environment, or acquire the resources needed to build a new one.
So my question is more of a "best practices" idea.
Thanks again to all.
Daniel Hubler
Aurora Healthcare
IT Infrastructure
daniel.hubler_at_aurora.org
From: Hubler, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:27 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Use the existing RAC. . . or build another one?
We have to decide if we are going to put a new database instance in our existing 2-node RAC, or build a second cluster for the new database.
We are talking 2 separate off-the-shelf products from a single vendor; the vendor will not support putting the 2 schemas into a single database.
The 2 products are tied very closely together; but do operate independently when/if necessary.
We are debating amongst ourselves the pros/cons of each strategy.
Any comments/suggestions/war-stories would be appreciated.
Thanks.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Apr 16 2015 - 16:56:00 CEST