Re: HASH Partitioning question
From: Tim Gorman <tim_at_evdbt.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:17:32 -0700
Message-ID: <54DD186C.6010002_at_evdbt.com>
C'mon, you need to give us more than that, please?
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:17:32 -0700
Message-ID: <54DD186C.6010002_at_evdbt.com>
C'mon, you need to give us more than that, please?
Query for one row? Query for 10 million rows? Aggregating? Not aggregating? Exadata or laptop or something in between? Oracle7? Oracle8i? Windows? Linux? Android?
On 2/12/15 13:55, Deepak Sharma (Redacted sender
sharmakdeep_oracle_at_yahoo.com for DMARC) wrote:
> Is it true that if a table (say 1 billion rows) is HASH Partitioned,
> then the most efficient way to query it needs to use Oracle parallel
> threads ?
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Feb 12 2015 - 22:17:32 CET