Re: Oracle 13
From: David Fitzjarrell <oratune_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:31:55 -0800
Message-ID: <1415208715.52031.YahooMailNeo_at_web124703.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Shades of SQL Server!!! Blasphemy!!! Of course there will be an Oracle 13; the only number they've skipped so far is 1 because 2 sounded like a better version for an initial public release.
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:31:55 -0800
Message-ID: <1415208715.52031.YahooMailNeo_at_web124703.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Shades of SQL Server!!! Blasphemy!!! Of course there will be an Oracle 13; the only number they've skipped so far is 1 because 2 sounded like a better version for an initial public release.
Tell me your calendar is still showing April 1st.
David Fitzjarrell
Principal author, "Oracle Exadata Survival Guide"
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:08 AM, Patrice sur GMail <patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
I am wondering whether Oracle will skip 13 the way some apartment buildings and hotels refuse to have a 13th floor...
The marketing meetings must be pretty funny at this point.
Maybe they will call it Oracle 2015 ?
- PatriceMy profiles:
Signature powered by WiseStamp
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 05 2014 - 18:31:55 CET