Re: Some body know the impact in performance of unused database options installed
From: Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <jcdrpllist_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:55:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGYrQyuFrp2hTuwPzWBDWp-q6D=-a4hR-CfvN99-XHA9Q-8uew_at_mail.gmail.com>
If I remember SAP did that, created all by themselves.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:55:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGYrQyuFrp2hTuwPzWBDWp-q6D=-a4hR-CfvN99-XHA9Q-8uew_at_mail.gmail.com>
If I remember SAP did that, created all by themselves.
2014-10-20 15:40 GMT-04:00 Iggy Fernandez <iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com>:
> At the risk of being booed, I cannot help thinking that the database with
> the least overhead as well as the most secure is one that has no data
> dictionary or options whatsoever; that is, one created with CREATE DATABASE
> and nothing else. Yes, you will be able to create users, tables, indexes,
> etc but you will have no data dictionary whatsoever. No DBA_TABLES. No
> overhead and no "attack vectors" either. Am I completely crazy? Stark
> raving mad?
>
> Iggy
>
> P.S. With just a little extra, you will be able to create PL/SQL
> functions, procedures, and triggers.
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Oct 21 2014 - 16:55:56 CEST