Re: Oracle 12c Inmemory - don't stop thinking
From: Martin Klier <usn_at_usn-it.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:32:17 +0200
Message-ID: <53D74E01.7080906_at_usn-it.de>
Hey folks,
> column store with, generally with an alter table or alter partition
> statement per object.
>
> This is not correct. I proved otherwise in Part II. You may argue the
> proof was too far fetched as you wish and I won't argue that.
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:32:17 +0200
Message-ID: <53D74E01.7080906_at_usn-it.de>
Hey folks,
as the OP of this thread I have to say:
* sorry - for the unintended hailstorm over Kevin
* thank you - for the nevertheless productive outcome, I learned a lot.
Thank you all for being my favourite mailing list. :)
Stay safe
Martin Klier
Am 28.07.2014 23:30, schrieb Kevin Closson:
>> Then you have to tell Oracle which objects you want to populate the
> column store with, generally with an alter table or alter partition
> statement per object.
>
> This is not correct. I proved otherwise in Part II. You may argue the
> proof was too far fetched as you wish and I won't argue that.
-- Usn's IT Blog for Oracle and Linux http://www.usn-it.de performing databases Your reliability. Our concern. http://www.performing-databases.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jul 29 2014 - 09:32:17 CEST