Re: Source for tim=nnnnn in 10046 trace
From: Gints Plivna <gints.plivna_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:35:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAN2wOq1fXYtL1HRhKF70jAsr-WVJ-hhtn+QfgkoJNAw1fJyHqA_at_mail.gmail.com>
Speaking about the first question I think it was pretty clear in the book: In releases ______*prior to Oracle9i*________, tim is a V$TIMER.HSECS value expressed in
centiseconds (1 cs = 0.01 seconds).
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:35:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAN2wOq1fXYtL1HRhKF70jAsr-WVJ-hhtn+QfgkoJNAw1fJyHqA_at_mail.gmail.com>
Speaking about the first question I think it was pretty clear in the book: In releases ______*prior to Oracle9i*________, tim is a V$TIMER.HSECS value expressed in
centiseconds (1 cs = 0.01 seconds).
As I'm more on development side, don't have any big experience on AIX, so cannot make any comments about that.
Gints
2013/8/22 rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com>
> Thanks Gints,
>
> I am talking 11203 on Linux and AIX, so I understand those are in
> microseconds, but what I am interested in is, it is time in microseconds
> _since when_ ? and are there any caveats on AIX7 ?.
>
> just curious that is all.
>
> Raj
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Aug 22 2013 - 15:35:21 CEST