RE: Doubt related to ROWID
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:13:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CE70217733273F49A8A162EE074F64D9014175BE_at_exmbx06.thus.corp>
Logged on as sys:
SQL> l
1 select cluster_name, count(*)
2 from user_tables
3 where cluster_name is not null
4 group by cluster_name
5 -- having count(*) > 1
6* order by 1
SQL> /
CLUSTER_NAME COUNT(*)
-------------------------------- ----------
C_COBJ# 2 C_FILE#_BLOCK# 2 C_MLOG# 2 C_OBJ# 17 C_OBJ#_INTCOL# 1 C_RG# 2 C_TOID_VERSION# 6 C_TS# 2 C_USER# 2 SMON_SCN_TO_TIME_AUX 1
10 rows selected.
I've always thought c_obj# most educational - and it keeps growing !
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
From: Mark W. Farnham [mwf_at_rsiz.com]
Sent: 24 July 2013 20:49
To: Jonathan Lewis; 'Ric Van Dyke'; 'ORACLE-L' Subject: RE: Doubt related to ROWID
Cannot resist: Mission Accomplished. As self-appointed judge of geek contests I declare Jonathan has out-geeked Ric this time.
BTW, we ALL use clusters pretty much all the time:
OWNER CLUSTER_NAMETABLESPACE_NAME
------------------------------ ------------------------------
SYS SMON_SCN_TO_TIME_AUX SYSAUX SYS C_COBJ# SYSTEM SYS C_FILE#_BLOCK# SYSTEM SYS C_MLOG# SYSTEM SYS C_OBJ# SYSTEM SYS C_OBJ#_INTCOL# SYSTEM SYS C_RG# SYSTEM SYS C_TOID_VERSION# SYSTEM SYS C_TS# SYSTEM SYS C_USER# SYSTEM
If you want to go extra geeky, read the sql.bsq file (which I'm quite sure both participants in the geekiest contest have done.) The comments about what the v6 developers (architects?) thought would be sufficient size for the number of columns of the day are hilarious. (And they were very very smart persons, no doubt there. Changing times...)
mwf--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jul 24 2013 - 23:13:39 CEST