RE: best practice maximum number of OS processes

From: <tim_at_evdbt.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:46:49 -0700
Message-Id: <20130612154649.c84976551849b6e0eb4ffca8ddbd2981.9acc0aaf42.wbe_at_email01.secureserver.net>

 Untrue since the days chip speed was measured in single-digit MHz.&n= bsp; Someone is spouting BS like it's 1989...
= =0A=0A=0A-------- Original Message --= ------
=0ASubject: best practice maximum number of OS processes
=0AFr= om: Josh Collier <Josh.Coll= ier_at_banfield.net[1]>
=0ADate: Wed, June 12, 2013 4:35 pm
=0ATo: "= oracle-l_at_freelists.org[2]" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org[2]>

• =0A
  =0AHi,
  =0AI am trying to validate the following statement for red= hat linux 64bit
  5.4, 11.2.0.2:
  =0A
  =0AIt is a best practice to limit= the number of operating system processes
  to no more than 8 times the numbe= r of CPU cores
  =0A
  =0A
  =0ADoes this sound reasonable? This would m= ean on a 32 core system I would
  be limited to no more 256 processes to serv= e my queries. In a partitioned data warehouse.
  =0A
  =0AThanks for your= time,
  =0A
  =0AJoshC.
  =0A
  =0A--
  =0Ahttp://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l[3]=0A
  =0A
  =0A=0A=0A
  
  • Links --- 1 3D"mailto:Josh.Collier_at_banfield.net" 2 3D"mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org" 3 3D"http://www.free= -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Jun 13 2013 - 00:46:49 CEST