RE: linux Async io
From: Michael McMullen <ganstadba_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:38:12 -0400
Message-ID: <SNT002-W115C78E431A989D9FF32A0A6D00_at_phx.gbl>
I've been using SLOB as a benchmark for all new server builds. It makes it nice, simple and repeatable so that you can work with sysadmins/storage to troubleshoot problems.
> From: Joan.Hsieh_at_tufts.edu
> To: mwf_at_rsiz.com; frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com; david.barbour1_at_gmail.com
> CC: ORACLE-L_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: linux Async io
> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:00:57 +0000
>
> Thanks Mark,
>
> I'm curious the sync setting, but we are actually experiencing the performance issue, 60% of wait time is user io, db_ sequential_read is on top of it. This is a show stopper for us, and I am trying to find out the cause.
>
> Joan
>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:38:12 -0400
Message-ID: <SNT002-W115C78E431A989D9FF32A0A6D00_at_phx.gbl>
I've been using SLOB as a benchmark for all new server builds. It makes it nice, simple and repeatable so that you can work with sysadmins/storage to troubleshoot problems.
> From: Joan.Hsieh_at_tufts.edu
> To: mwf_at_rsiz.com; frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com; david.barbour1_at_gmail.com
> CC: ORACLE-L_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: linux Async io
> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:00:57 +0000
>
> Thanks Mark,
>
> I'm curious the sync setting, but we are actually experiencing the performance issue, 60% of wait time is user io, db_ sequential_read is on top of it. This is a show stopper for us, and I am trying to find out the cause.
>
> Joan
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 26 2013 - 18:38:12 CET