Re: ORA-15042: ASM disk "xx" is missing
From: Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:29:05 +0100
Message-ID: <50E55D71.5000906_at_gmail.com>
On 03/01/2013 11:09, Fergal Taheny wrote: [...]
> But all that the truss proves is that the process
> can't read from these devices that it finds in the asm_diskstring. These
> could just have been devices that were just left behind by a sloppy
> administrator!
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:29:05 +0100
Message-ID: <50E55D71.5000906_at_gmail.com>
On 03/01/2013 11:09, Fergal Taheny wrote: [...]
> But all that the truss proves is that the process
> can't read from these devices that it finds in the asm_diskstring. These
> could just have been devices that were just left behind by a sloppy
> administrator!
Yep, correct ...
Actually Oracle could only store the minimum number of disks/disk per fg
necessary
to open a given disk group, it doesn't need the actual device/disk names.
Regards
Dimitre
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jan 03 2013 - 11:29:05 CET