Re: Use of IPv6 with Oracle anyone?
From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:01:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CALH8A92EVgThLF081tWZ94tDhZF2wcmG0nFKrSu8c08OrePsZg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Unfortunately especially the interconnect is not supported for IPv6 yet. Regular SQL*NET traffic (via Listener) or using CMAN as a protocol gateway is IPv6-supported in latest releases.
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:01:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CALH8A92EVgThLF081tWZ94tDhZF2wcmG0nFKrSu8c08OrePsZg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Unfortunately especially the interconnect is not supported for IPv6 yet. Regular SQL*NET traffic (via Listener) or using CMAN as a protocol gateway is IPv6-supported in latest releases.
best regards,
Martin
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 14:41, saurabh manroy <saurabhmanroy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Leaving apart the ever(never?) exhausting address space of IPV4, One area
> that I can think of where use of IPV6 might prove useful is Interconnect
> Traffic:
> With ever growing data and network traffic, it wouldn't be long when the
> need for transferring of larger packets over cluster interconnect would
> become a necessity.We are already using IPV4 jumboframes for it.
>
> Using IPV6 jumbograms, which have support for packet size bigger than IPV4
> jumboframes would only be beneficial. I don't see any research happening in
> that area for IPV4.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Feb 14 2012 - 06:01:20 CST