Re: AWR PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES
From: Sriram Kumar <k.sriramkumar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:24:01 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEq4C0dsareeqiHFc8evrikTPKAD51PqC-9ejd5WJaC_hU-LnQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ronnie,
I would suggest
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:24:01 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEq4C0dsareeqiHFc8evrikTPKAD51PqC-9ejd5WJaC_hU-LnQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ronnie,
I would suggest
- You could possibly execute a prtconf on solaris and cross verify with the AWR.
- Check with the system administrator if virtualization (DSD -- Dynamic System Domains or Containers) is enabled on the server which being the case, the memory could be configured to dynamically move between partitions or containers.
Best Regards
Sriram Kumar
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Fred Tilly <ftilly_at_btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been asked to review two awr reports from a RAC two node cluster
> running Oracle 10.2.0.3 on Solaris. When I checked the OS settings in the
> AWR report I could see that MEMORY_PHYSICAL_BYTES was showing 16GB for each
> node. When I detailed this in the report the DBA informed me that each
> server only had 8GB not 16GB.
>
>
> It was my believe that the AWR report showed the memory on that server, is
> this correct ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ronnie
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Feb 03 2012 - 07:54:01 CST