Re: infoworld call

From: Rich Jesse <rjoralist2_at_society.servebeer.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:00:07 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <6bdcc815714886e7e25a061e873e9e75.squirrel_at_society.servebeer.com>

Ray writes:

> infoworld say this bug is really ugly.

Well that certainly does sound potentially ugly. And it describes the reason behind the 16K/s transaction limitation that was discussed here a few years back.

At least I have my SCN growth patterns for about a year now and we won't even hit 80B in the next 10 years. At current rates. Provided nothing else changes. Ever...

Marking that patch down for my upgrade to 11g. Thanks Ray!

Rich

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jan 17 2012 - 12:00:07 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wolfgang Breitling: "Re: SQL Performance Problem between 2 Databases WITH FIX included for this case"
Previous message: Taylor, Chris David: "RE: SQL Performance Problem between 2 Databases WITH FIX included for this case"
In reply to: Ray Stell: "infoworld call"
Next in thread: Marcin Przepiorowski: "Re: infoworld call"
Reply: Marcin Przepiorowski: "Re: infoworld call"
Reply: De DBA: "Re: infoworld call"
Reply: De DBA: "Re: infoworld call"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message