Re: why no native Oracle XE 11g for Mac OS X?
From: Sven Aluoor <aluoor_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:31:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CANqyDm3gPz8LFaxeSjj-b3XmcZVdfgwev8Lmj=mnu1ED53G6nQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tim Hall <tim_at_oracle-base.com> wrote:
> Oracle produces server software. With that in mind, do you think OS X
> warrants any attention from Oracle? When they release a new server
> product, should OS X be on their list of platforms to care about? I
> wouldn't waste my time and money on it, and typically they don't
> either.
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:31:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CANqyDm3gPz8LFaxeSjj-b3XmcZVdfgwev8Lmj=mnu1ED53G6nQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tim Hall <tim_at_oracle-base.com> wrote:
> Oracle produces server software. With that in mind, do you think OS X
> warrants any attention from Oracle? When they release a new server
> product, should OS X be on their list of platforms to care about? I
> wouldn't waste my time and money on it, and typically they don't
> either.
There is a server version of Lion, which includes PostgreSQL.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sat Sep 17 2011 - 09:31:52 CDT