Re: Somewhat OT - interesting interview of Mike Stonebraker
From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:01:58 +1000
Message-ID: <4E17A886.80201_at_iinet.net.au>
Actually he starts by dissing ACID, then proceeds to say it is essential, *if* done the way his NewSQL thingie does it.
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:01:58 +1000
Message-ID: <4E17A886.80201_at_iinet.net.au>
Actually he starts by dissing ACID, then proceeds to say it is essential, *if* done the way his NewSQL thingie does it.
"It would be easy to accuse Stonebraker of tooting his own horn"
Narh! Perish the thought. He's NEVER done that!.... (anyone still believe in this guy other than the "next big thing" brigade?)
-- Cheers Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia dbvision_at_iinet.net.au Mario Cariggi wrote,on my timestamp of 9/07/2011 6:50 AM:Received on Fri Jul 08 2011 - 20:01:58 CDT
> "maintaining ACID compliance" [sic] is considered an overhead, weird!
>
> that is just what a DBMS has to provide to be considered a DBMS.
>
> Mario.
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 17:28, Stephane Faroult<sfaroult_at_roughsea.com> wrote:
>> http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/
>> --
>> Stephane Faroult
>> RoughSea Ltd
>> Konagora
>> RoughSea Channel on Youtube
>>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l