Re: anyone ran into ORA-00752 on dataguard node with ASM/11.1.0.7 Linux?
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:54:18 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJsOtB5kCvUWjDHZxmc+OdCtMK+4QiMSb_hUZsWYsxQBugUWoA_at_mail.gmail.com>
Ask on mos if all the three standby are failing at the same time By the way is your primary facing the same corruption issue
On 6 Jul 2011 20:35, "Zhu,Chao" <zhuchao_at_gmail.com> wrote:
hi, guys
We ran into weird corruption in standby nodes in our first production oracle/linux deployment, which is pretty frustrate;
Would appreciate if anyone else has ran into similar issues and share with your solution; Working with oracle sucks, no progress in the past 2 months and now pointing fingers to HW(hp DL380G7); Which obviously is not the case as all 3 standby always consistently fails at the same block#/log#, and we tried move redo to different location/ASM/filesystem(datafile in primary still at ASM);
Details:
Application: Oracle RUEI on Linux(redhat 5.5)
RDBMS: 11.1.0.7.4
ASM: 11.2.0.2
primary is fine;
dataguard node:
Tue Jul 05 18:10:00 2011
Slave exiting with ORA-752 exception
Errors in file
/oracle/RUEICEM/home/diag/rdbms/rueicem/RUEICEM/trace/RUEICEM_pr06_18594.trc:
*ORA-00752: recovery detected a lost write of a data block*
*ORA-10567: Redo is inconsistent with data block (file# 84, block# 266478)*
ORA-10564: tablespace USERS
ORA-01110: data file 84: '+DATA/rueicem/datafile/users.404.752266499'
ORA-10561: block type 'TRANSACTION MANAGED DATA BLOCK', data object# 5082441
or:
Errors in file
/oracle/RUEICEM/home/products/diag/rdbms/rueicem/RUEICEM/trace/RUEICEM_pr0e_14272.trc
(incident=101514):
*ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3020], [84], [266478],
[352588014], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []*
*ORA-10567: Redo is inconsistent with data block (file# 84, block# 266478)*
ORA-10564: tablespace USERS
ORA-01110: data file 84: '+DATA/rueicem/datafile/rueicem_userruei01_35.dbf'
ORA-10561: block type 'TRANSACTION MANAGED DATA BLOCK', data object# 5082441
Incident details in:
/oracle/RUEICEM/home/products/diag/rdbms/rueicem/RUEICEM/incident/incdir_101514/RUEICEM_pr0e_14272_i101514.trc
some of our investigation done:
- All 3 standby database failed at the same log#/block#; Including the standby with datafile/redo all on filesystem;
- The standby database cant be recovered even set db_lost_write_protect = none;
- The standby can still be open after it failed at that block#/log#; DBV is still clean for that datafile by that time; but no way to recover through;
- The standby can be recovered through through “recover standby database allow 1 corruption”; But dbv did report corrupted block, and fts did report corrupted block and fts fails; Thanks for your sharing, if we dont have any progress, we will have to upgrade RDBMS to 11.2 as well (as 3rd party application, dont really want to do that.)
-- Regards Zhu Chao -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 06 2011 - 11:24:18 CDT