Re: Strange Datapump behavior.
From: rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:44:55 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=pWCrLRjON2jr03XN0dBQfJOL6uw_at_mail.gmail.com>
Were those tables by newuser pre-existing or created via datapump? are any existing FK involved? is impdp complaining with import? anything in dwnn.rc files (usually in bdump) ? is it possible that due to flashback, the table actually had less rows than current?
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:44:55 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=pWCrLRjON2jr03XN0dBQfJOL6uw_at_mail.gmail.com>
Were those tables by newuser pre-existing or created via datapump? are any existing FK involved? is impdp complaining with import? anything in dwnn.rc files (usually in bdump) ? is it possible that due to flashback, the table actually had less rows than current?
Raj
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Jun 20 2011 - 12:44:55 CDT