Re: Partitioned or non-partitioned indexes
From: Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:25:14 -0600
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ju_VNfknz1mo1RE1fEqBuHQqueg_at_mail.gmail.com>
The detail table will have about 2.1 million rows. Is that still small for partitioning?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:25:14 -0600
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ju_VNfknz1mo1RE1fEqBuHQqueg_at_mail.gmail.com>
The detail table will have about 2.1 million rows. Is that still small for partitioning?
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Apr 25 2011 - 17:25:14 CDT