Re: Process and sessions overhead
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:07:36 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimASWv2Z1VF-HMUh6b=dgHsjfA8J6FkSd38nsni_at_mail.gmail.com>
Or I could read the question! The extra space allocated to the process table itself isn't worth caring about - the allocations as processes connect is
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:07:36 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimASWv2Z1VF-HMUh6b=dgHsjfA8J6FkSd38nsni_at_mail.gmail.com>
Or I could read the question! The extra space allocated to the process table itself isn't worth caring about - the allocations as processes connect is
On 8 Mar 2011 17:04, "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
On Windows 1000m! I don't have other o/s details in my brain. Also consider if hugepages is in use or not
>
> On 8 Mar 2011 16:50, "CRISLER, JON A (ATTCORP)" <JC1706_at_att.com> wrote:
>
> What is the memory ...
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 08 2011 - 11:07:36 CST