Re: Auto stats gathering is not sufficient - what now?
From: David Aldridge <david_at_david-aldridge.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <556930.79773.qm_at_web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <556930.79773.qm_at_web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
You could consider not gathering statistics at all -- delete current statistics and lock the table statistics -- and rely on dynamic sampling. The usual duration of reporting queries against large tables, particularly the consequences for the duration if the execution plan is incorrect, generally make the dynamic sampling overhead acceptable. ________________________________ From: TJ Kiernan <tkiernan_at_pti-nps.com> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Cc: TJ Kiernan <tkiernan_at_pti-nps.com> Sent: Wed, 9 February, 2011 19:50:07 Subject: Auto stats gathering is not sufficient - what now? 10.2.0.3 on 32-bit Windows 2003 R2 I have a reporting table that is too large to grow by 10% very often - 66 million records growing by 250k per week = 24 weeks before stats go stale and are gathered, meanwhile queries against relatively recent data (last month, last quarter) get horrible execution plans unless we hint them. For instance, from the example below, we have an index on (GROUP_KEY, DATE_PROCESSED) that would return this query in <1 second. If my predicate values were in range of the statistics, then I expect to get better plans, so the first thing I’m considering is a periodic job (probably weekly) to gather stats on this table. My question: What sorts of considerations should I make when setting up a non-standard stats gathering job? Particularly METHOD_OPT, but with other parameters as well, what prompts you to step away from defaults? PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL_ID 0udsqttt83syw, child number 0 ------------------------------------- SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ field1, field2, DATE_PROCESSED FROM REPORTING_TABLE WHERE GROUP_KEY = 1234 AND DATE_PROCESSED > to_date('25-DEC-2010', 'DD-MON-YYYY') ORDER BY GROUP_KEY, DATE_PROCESSED Plan hash value: 3444608443 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| REPORTING_TABLE | 1 | 1 | 28 |00:00:05.84 | 617K| 148K| |* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RT_DATE_IDX | 1 | 2 | 1599K|00:00:28.81 | 6065 | 5828 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - filter("GROUP_KEY"=1234) 2 - access("DATE_PROCESSED">TO_DATE('2010-12-25 00:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) filter("DATE_PROCESSED">TO_DATE('2010-12-25 00:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) ****10053 trace***** Access Path: index (RangeScan) Index: RT_DATE_IDX resc_io: 4.00 resc_cpu: 31027 ix_sel: 2.4406e-008 ix_sel_with_filters: 2.4406e-008 Cost: 4.01 Resp: 4.01 Degree: 1 Using prorated density: 2.4406e-008 of col #2 as selectivity of out-of-range value pred Using prorated density: 2.4406e-008 of col #2 as selectivity of out-of-range value pred Access Path: index (RangeScan) Index: RT_GROUP_DP_IDX resc_io: 5.00 resc_cpu: 36837 ix_sel: 3.9615e-010 ix_sel_with_filters: 3.9615e-010 Cost: 5.01 Resp: 5.01 Degree: 1 Using prorated density: 2.4406e-008 of col #2 as selectivity of out-of-range value pred T. J. Kiernan Database Administrator Pharmaceutical Technologies, Inc. (402) 965-8800 ext 1039 tkiernan_at_pti-nps.com
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Feb 10 2011 - 02:16:09 CST