Re: RE: 11g RedHat 5 and Hugepages
From: Greg Rahn <greg_at_structureddata.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:13:38 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQdkQq6Cd5NvaWPUSHygJcxD0=m0Lc2c1mfi2P_at_mail.gmail.com>
There may be issues with MTS but no where near the issues of having an application that needs 75k db connections. This must be one poorly written application.
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:13:38 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQdkQq6Cd5NvaWPUSHygJcxD0=m0Lc2c1mfi2P_at_mail.gmail.com>
There may be issues with MTS but no where near the issues of having an application that needs 75k db connections. This must be one poorly written application.
I can't imagine how much CPU the dispatchers would burn for that many connections.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Crisler, Jon <Jon.Crisler_at_usi.com> wrote:
> Possibly- there are issues with MTS and they want enough headroom so that
> they can run without MTS and possibly connection pooling tuned very
> conservatively on the app host side. On the current, undersized
> configuration, they have already seen 75,000 connections at peak periods.
-- Regards, Greg Rahn http://structureddata.org -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 22:13:38 CDT