Active Dataguard vs. regular Dataguard performance- 11gR1
From: Crisler, Jon <Jon.Crisler_at_usi.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:15:30 -0400
Message-ID: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB06750714F16A_at_mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
Are there any performance implications for Active Dataguard (DG) compared to standard DG? I am thinking primarily in the areas of transport time and bandwidth, and somewhat in disk i/o. Thanks in advance.
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:15:30 -0400
Message-ID: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB06750714F16A_at_mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
Are there any performance implications for Active Dataguard (DG) compared to standard DG? I am thinking primarily in the areas of transport time and bandwidth, and somewhat in disk i/o. Thanks in advance.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Sep 20 2010 - 10:15:30 CDT