Re: ASM on SAN

From: Robert Bialek <bialekr_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:45:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4B82DEE1.8030706_at_gmail.com>

> If that is the case then why did Oracle provide a range of AU_SIZE in 11G ( 1M, 2M, 4M, 8M, 16M, 32M, 64M)? I do not believe one size fits all as far as au_size is concerned.
>

It's also my opinion. I think we need additionally to consider that the stripe size
is equal to au_size (for coarse file striping).

Cheers,
Robert

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Feb 22 2010 - 13:45:37 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Allen, Brandon: "RE: RMAN: Partial Backup: Metadata Only in Some Tablespaces and Full Data in Another"
Previous message: Langston, Chris: "RMAN: Partial Backup: Metadata Only in Some Tablespaces and Full Data in Another"
In reply to: John Hallas: "RE: ASM on SAN"
Next in thread: Greg Rahn: "Re: ASM on SAN"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message