RE: SAP on Oracle doubts

From: Blanchard, William <wblanchard_at_societyinsurance.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:36:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CB340D772D072D47A5DE07533432A7E50E7904D6_at_exch1.soc.int>



Correct. What I meant by my "functional" comment was just that if you can deal with the craptacular UI, the tight coupling to the database and stupid transaction codes it will do what you want it to. You are correct with your metaphor to describe SAP as "using a handsaw to fell a tree".    

WGB   From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Goulet, Richard Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:29 AM To: goran bogdanovic; ORACLE-L
Cc: jsidba_at_gmail.com; jo.holvoet_at_thomascook.be; niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com
Subject: RE: SAP on Oracle doubts  

That's about the size of it. Someone made the comment that their applications where "functional" which is true, similar to using a handsaw to fell a tree. It's work, but there are better tools out there.  

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International    


From: goran bogdanovic [mailto:goran00_at_gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:22 AM To: ORACLE-L
Cc: jsidba_at_gmail.com; jo.holvoet_at_thomascook.be; niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com; Goulet, Richard Subject: Re: SAP on Oracle doubts

Thanks you all for answers.

You just confirmed my fears ... there are also other configuration issues which I did't mention here since if this can't be resolved, no point to bother for the rest - 'take it or leave it' ;-)

cheers,
goran

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Feb 10 2010 - 11:36:07 CST

Original text of this message