Re: Oracle RAC Server Conf.

From: <troach_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:33:49 +0000
Message-ID: 1655255927-1264285952-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-873151221-_at_bda492.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>

Build the cluster out of legos and load each up with 1.9 TB of ram and run everything in memory eliminating all physical I/O. Throw in 500 TB of ssd based storage and a nuclear power plant to power it and you are good to go. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----

From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:59:30
To: <mzito_at_gridapp.com>
Cc: <robertgfreeman_at_yahoo.com>; <verma.labs_at_gmail.com>; Oracle-L Freelists<oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Subject: Re: Oracle RAC Server Conf.

Actually, a 100node RAC would have a massive overhead in cluster administration and would almost certainly be slower than a smaller RAC environment...

On the other hand... it might be faster than VMWare ;-) Alan.-

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Sat Jan 23 2010 - 16:33:49 CST