Re: Question about patch levels
From: Yechiel Adar <adar666_at_inter.net.il>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:28:49 +0300
Message-id: <4A94E431.5020801_at_inter.net.il>
You are right in principle.
However, he used windows '\' rather then Linux '/' in the directory list so I assumed Windows.
We generally use only one database per windows server. Add to that the fact that he uses separate home for each CPU, so my question is relevant.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:28:49 +0300
Message-id: <4A94E431.5020801_at_inter.net.il>
You are right in principle.
However, he used windows '\' rather then Linux '/' in the directory list so I assumed Windows.
We generally use only one database per windows server. Add to that the fact that he uses separate home for each CPU, so my question is relevant.
Maybe it needed to be: Why use a separate home for each patch level?
Adar Yechiel
Rechovot, Israel
Niall Litchfield wrote:
> I can't speak for Charles, but sometimes this is a sensible idea in
> the event of wishing to roll back an upgrade, or more generally when
> you have multiple database applications on the same server, then the
> slowest/most difficult to update doesn't hold everyone back. .
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Aug 26 2009 - 02:28:49 CDT