Re: ok this sounds crazy BUT, is it a bug

From: <TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:22:51 -0400
Message-ID: <OFA0F811BB.884365DB-ON85257608.0059E485-85257608.0059FBA7_at_lnotes-gw.ent.nwie.net>

Well i forced enough log switches to have gone thru all of the redo logs, and that forced it across, I'm thinking that even though I asked to redo log delay, its really falling back to archive logs apply, time to go and dig in the DRC*.logs.

thanks, joe

---

Joe Testa, Oracle Certified Professional (Work) 614-677-1668
(Cell) 614-312-6715

Interested in helping out your marriage? Ask me about "Weekend to Remember"
Dec 11-13, 2009 here in Columbus.

From:
Martin Klier <usn_at_usn-it.de>
To:
TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com
Cc:
oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Date:
08/04/2009 12:12 PM
Subject:
Re: ok this sounds crazy BUT, is it a bug

Hi,

I have always been under the impression, that the delay should be configured on the STANDBY side only, to make sure that all archives are on the other side, just in case the primary location burns down.

Maybe this solves this issue as well?

Reagrds
Martin

TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com schrieb:
> Martin, yes a log file switch moves the log to the standby, applies it,
> but I don't see the specific change I made on the primary, what you're
> guessing is what I thought also, no real-time applies implies archive
log
> apply. But it doesn't seem to be working that way.

-- 
Usn's IT Blog for Linux, Oracle, Asterisk
http://www.usn-it.de




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Aug 04 2009 - 11:22:51 CDT