RE: Locally managed tablespaces - autoallocate vs. uniform

From: Schauss, R. Peter (IT Solutions) <"Schauss,>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:52:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CD9150D80CFCFB42BC73C40791C1E01904F00C1B_at_XMBIL112.northgrum.com>

How did the product cause free space fragmentation?

Peter Schauss

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Powell, Mark D Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:04 PM
To: Oracle L
Subject: RE: Locally managed tablespaces - autoallocate vs. uniform

...
...

With one exception where the product actually managed to create a free space fragmentation condition the feature works well. For that one product we converted the tablespace to using uniform extents and have not had an issue since.

Mark D Powell -- Phone (313) 592-5148

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jul 28 2009 - 13:52:23 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Allen, Brandon: "RE: GRID"
Previous message: Barbara Baker: "substr instr"
In reply to: Powell, Mark D: "RE: Locally managed tablespaces - autoallocate vs. uniform"
Next in thread: Mark Brinsmead: "Re: Locally managed tablespaces - autoallocate vs. uniform"
Reply: Mark Brinsmead: "Re: Locally managed tablespaces - autoallocate vs. uniform"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message