Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam

From: David Ballester <ballester.david_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:06:08 +0200
Message-ID: <6a29f8b0907061206g1d0f5919y569c20fada6a8dc_at_mail.gmail.com>



2009/7/6 Matthew Zito <mzito_at_gridapp.com>

> I think very on-topic, but if you read the article, they modified
> PostgreSQL to be columnar instead of row-based. This holds up with another
> school of thought from folks like Vertica that column-oriented databases are
> the “way to go” to scale to these types of data sizes and ranges. Yet
> another variant on the traditional RDBMS for specific uses. They also
> mentioned that yahoo acquired the technology from a small startup, and then
> adapted it.
>
>
>
> Matt
>

Yes, that's what I said that they get the postgresql source code and rebuild some part ( for example, major ACID code ) sorry for my english O:D. In anyway where I wanna focus is in the fact that, immo, no enteprise company has developed a solution to meet this hungry services, and each one has developed is own.

D.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jul 06 2009 - 14:06:08 CDT

Original text of this message