RE: Oracle Provisioning Pack
From: Matthew Zito <mzito_at_gridapp.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:21:44 -0400
Message-ID: <C0A5E31718FC064A91E9FD7BE2F081B1021A3BE4_at_exchange.gridapp.com>
I asked this question on the list a month or two back, and got a fair number of responses. Full disclosure - my company makes a product that a number of companies use in lieu of Provisioning Pack, so take anything I say with a big grain of salt. The general feedback, both on- and off-list:
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:21:44 -0400
Message-ID: <C0A5E31718FC064A91E9FD7BE2F081B1021A3BE4_at_exchange.gridapp.com>
I asked this question on the list a month or two back, and got a fair number of responses. Full disclosure - my company makes a product that a number of companies use in lieu of Provisioning Pack, so take anything I say with a big grain of salt. The general feedback, both on- and off-list:
- Database cloning works pretty well, with some limitations
- No one reported success getting RAC provisioning to work with Provsioning Pack
- Mixed reports on using it for patching - some people said it worked fine, others said they had to throw it out. Regardless, everyone agreed that the download from metalink and staging of patches via OEM was a nice feature
- No one seemed to have used Provisioning pack to build databases/ORACLE_HOMEs from scratch - instead they built them by hand and then cloned them to the desired servers
- No one had used OEM for bare-metal OS provisioning
I think that was the overall feedback. Is there anything in particular you're looking at it to do?
Thanks,
Matt
-- Matthew Zito Chief Scientist GridApp Systems P: 646-452-4090 mzito_at_gridapp.com http://www.gridapp.com -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Mary Elizabeth McNeely Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:12 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Oracle Provisioning Pack All, Has anyone used Oracle Provisioning Pack? If so, what did you think of it? Which features did you use? 10g or 11g? Is it the time-saver it's advertised to be? (If answering the time-saver question, how many databases/environments did you operate against? I'd like to determine at what number of databases/tiers this starts to save time: 10, 20, 50, 100 databases?) Thanks for whatever information you are willing to share. Kind regards, Mary Elizabeth McNeely -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jun 23 2009 - 11:21:44 CDT