Re: Manual Standby as alternative to dataguard
From: Mathias Magnusson <mathias.magnusson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:34:58 +0200
Message-ID: <8580d4110906162134x431ff613i5075c9a7e4ab53f3_at_mail.gmail.com>
Let's go back to the actual problem. What do you do in the transactions that causes this to be a problem? No-logging and forcing it only affects a limited number of operations. Could it be that it is not clearly understood by the business users when this actually would have an effect on the performance?
And by the way, I believe posting data recieved in MetaLink of cound in articles there is not allowed and could cause your support contract to be revoked.
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:34:58 +0200
Message-ID: <8580d4110906162134x431ff613i5075c9a7e4ab53f3_at_mail.gmail.com>
Let's go back to the actual problem. What do you do in the transactions that causes this to be a problem? No-logging and forcing it only affects a limited number of operations. Could it be that it is not clearly understood by the business users when this actually would have an effect on the performance?
And by the way, I believe posting data recieved in MetaLink of cound in articles there is not allowed and could cause your support contract to be revoked.
Mathias
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jun 16 2009 - 23:34:58 CDT