Re: ASM "disk" replacement
From: Rajeev Prabhakar <rprabha01_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:05:39 -0400
Message-ID: <2ba656800905071805r316383f3t54c9eba35114516b_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Don,
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:05:39 -0400
Message-ID: <2ba656800905071805r316383f3t54c9eba35114516b_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Don,
Depending upon the criticality / paranoia, comfort level and the current (disk discovery) stage, you could use either some or all of the following steps :
- Saving the mapping between your ASM devices and associated diskgroups OR all possible asm metadata information.
- Taking a backup of objects/tablespaces (if at all applicable) that belong to the particular diskgroup where devices will be dropped/added.
- Have action plan (from SAs/StorageAdmins) ready in case visibility of the disk(s) becomes an issue. Any udev/scsi commands/asmlib/san/lun/rescan etc commands.
- If critical/hightly accessed objects are residing in the diskgroup where some devices will be reshuffled, have another diskgroup ready with the necessary objects where application can be quickly pointed to.
- Be ready for (in extreme circumstances) one or two rounds of asm instance bounce in case of disk not being in proper state even after being discovered.
If I think of something else, I will let you know.
Best Regards,
Rajeev
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Don Granaman
<DonGranaman_at_solutionary.com> wrote:
> We are using ASM for 10.2.0.4 RAC on Linux x86-64 and will need to replace a
> number of disks in the storage array.
>
> I am wondering if anyone here has had any “interesting” experience with this
> sort of thing – good or bad.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu May 07 2009 - 20:05:39 CDT