Re: How to determine sessions with invalid package states
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:52:20 +0200
Message-ID: <ecf3dae70905070752o31f3777aya974b5bd62e83047_at_mail.gmail.com>
I work around this issue.
The way I work around this issue is that I introduce dedicated state-only packages. All packages with code are not allowed to have package-variables. The state-only packages have no further dependencies, they hold no code: i.e. their bodies will never get invalidated by newly replaced other objects.
And,
Since they hold no code, these state-only packages hardly ever require replacing themselves. Only when new state-variables are introduced.
In doing so I reduce the number of occurences of this issue, dramatically.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Rumpi Gravenstein <rgravens_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> I received a couple of responses on this -- the responses were around
> looking at locks. That will not help. I'm attempting to find packages that
> have invalid session state. The scenario is like so
>
> Session one calls package TEST that creates session state A
>
> Session two recompiles package TEST. If session one had a lock, this would
> not be possible. At this point session one's package state is invalid.
>
> Session one calls package TEST and receives something along the lines of:
> ORA-*04068: existing state of packagesstringstringstring has been
> discarded *
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Rumpi Gravenstein <rgravens_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Is it possible to write a query to identify sessions that are holding
>> invalidated package states? We are looking at issues around code
>> migrations. The goal is to only recycle sessions that we know will have
>> problems. Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Rumpi Gravenstein
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rumpi Gravenstein
>
-- Toon Koppelaars RuleGen BV +31-615907269 Toon.Koppelaars_at_RuleGen.com www.RuleGen.com TheHelsinkiDeclaration.blogspot.com (co)Author: "Applied Mathematics for Database Professionals" www.RuleGen.com/pls/apex/f?p=14265:13 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu May 07 2009 - 09:52:20 CDT