Re: views on views on views
From: Jack van Zanen <jack_at_vanzanen.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:19:23 +1100
Message-ID: <77a615a70903270519p3fd888bej25874be43e934772_at_mail.gmail.com>
I Like your style :-)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:19:23 +1100
Message-ID: <77a615a70903270519p3fd888bej25874be43e934772_at_mail.gmail.com>
I Like your style :-)
2009/3/27 Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
> Stephens, Chris wrote,on my timestamp of 27/03/2009 2:27 AM:
>
>
>> Do other people on the list have to contend with this issue?
>>
>
> Yup...
>
>
>
>> Have you gotten the developers to agree to limiting their use of views in
>> this way?
>>
>
> I found physical threats worked very well.
>
>
> Have any of you successfully dealt with the issue and if so, what
>> arguments did you make that allowed for that?
>>
>
> No more than one level of view.
> View on view guarantees them one place: the door.
> Works wonders.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> in sunny Sydney, Australia
> dbvision_at_iinet.net.au
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- Jack van Zanen ------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 27 2009 - 07:19:23 CDT