Re: standby at remote site

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:54:16 +0000
Message-ID: <7765c8970903260954g229d54cak5c18d73f0a9c5ac5_at_mail.gmail.com>

In addition to jason's remarks i'd add that you'll want to be clear about how switchover and failover will happen and how the choice of new primary is made. Then test at least switchover and resultant application and interface etc performance.

On 3/26/09, Jason Heinrich <jheinrichdba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a fairly common DR scenario. I would just make sure that you have
> sufficient bandwidth between the sites to ship the logs. See
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/pdf/MAA_WP_10gR2_DataGuardNetworkBestPractices.pdffor
> some tips on optimizing the redo transport.
>
> --
> Jason Heinrich
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Kumar Madduri <ksmadduri_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi List:
>> We have a standby here but we want to create an additional standby at a
>> remote location. So 2 standbys. One is in the same location (not the same
>> server) another in a remote location- this would be the DR site. Wanted
>> to
>> get the experience of the list and any areas to watch out for in this kind
>> of setup.
>>
>> Primary is 2 node rac. Standy is single instance; DB is on 10.2.0.4
>>
>> Thank you
>> Kumar
>>
>

-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Mar 26 2009 - 11:54:16 CDT