Re: Using 10gR2 as a 'document repository'

From: Jason Heinrich <jheinrichdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:42:33 -0500
Message-ID: <b32e774d0810030842o29eb8bf6u588651a5b09e19ba@mail.gmail.com>

No, Oracle hasn't lost interest in it. On the contrary, they saw enough potential in it that in 10g they rolled it into Oracle Content Database and started charging a lot of money for it.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Yong Huang <yong321_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

> In 2003, we tried Oracle 9iAS iFS as a replacement for Opentext's document
> management software Livelink. It worked well. I don't remember the reason
> but we gave up on it. Oracle seems to have lost interest in this product, as
> we have. Did Oracle change the name of iFS, or they dropped it?
>
> Yong Huang
>
>

-- 
Jason Heinrich

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Oct 03 2008 - 10:42:33 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stuart Blackburn: "URL Change in Grid Control"
Previous message: Niall Litchfield: "Streams and Dataguard"
In reply to: Yong Huang: "Re: Using 10gR2 as a 'document repository'"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message