RE: Listener under ASM or db?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:16:26 -0500
Message-ID: <7ED53A68952D3B4C9540B4EFA5C76E360544EBFD@CWYMSX04.Corp.Acxiom.net>
So if we ever add an addition 1+ database(s) to the server using ASM,
then it makes most sense to keep the listener under ASM. I'll buy that.
I just wanted a reason behind using one location of the other. Thanks
Mark!
Dave
Dave Herring, DBA | A c x i o m M I C S / C S O
630-944-4762 office | 630-430-5988 wireless | 630-944-4989 fax
From: Mark Strickland [mailto:strickland.mark_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:59 PM
To: Herring Dave - dherri
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Listener under ASM or db?
Dave, see Metalink Note #279353.1. You should run the listener and CSS from the ASM home. We're doing that here for new RAC installations.
Regards,
Mark Strickland
Seattle
The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Thank you.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Sep 17 2008 - 16:16:26 CDT