query cpu time in awr vs. addm
From: <fmhabash_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:38:04 -0400
Message-ID: <48C0391C.3090705@gmail.com>
Host CPU was a bottleneck and the instance was consuming 74% of the host CPU.
All wait times will be inflated by wait for CPU.
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:38:04 -0400
Message-ID: <48C0391C.3090705@gmail.com>
Hi all,
I have a query that is posting into the awr report with 9.07% db time
for the 1-hr period as seen below.
CPU Time (s) Elapsed Time (s) Executions CPU per Exec (s) % Total DB Time SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text 1,684 3,874 317 5.31 9.06 84vvc70n5pjvc <imap://fmhabash%40gmail%2Ecom@imap.gmail.com:993/fetch%3EUID%3E/Sent%3E1#84vvc70n5pjvc> JDBC Thin Client SELECT mes...
However, when i lookup the addm report for the same period, it is showing the following ...
FINDING 1: 55% impact (23359 seconds)
Host CPU was a bottleneck and the instance was consuming 74% of the host CPU.
All wait times will be inflated by wait for CPU.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 59% benefit (25255 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "84vvc70n5pjvc" for possible performance improvements.
My question is how can a query reported in awr to have 9% db time to have 55% impact on CPU time in addm? The seconds count and impact percentages just do not match or reconcile!
Thank you.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Sep 04 2008 - 14:38:04 CDT