Re: ASM - Active Passive role
From: Dan Norris <dannorris_at_dannorris.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:16:58 -0500
Message-ID: <48A9845A.5000401@dannorris.com>
Dan
LS Cheng wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:16:58 -0500
Message-ID: <48A9845A.5000401@dannorris.com>
In your case, did you set up ASM as clustered so that all DGs were available on all ASM instances at all times and the single-instance databases just failed over? Or did you actually fail over the disk groups as well?
Dan
LS Cheng wrote:
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Mon Aug 18 2008 - 09:16:58 CDTI have done it in a few customers without problems.Multipath is not provided by Sun Cluster, it depends on the Storage you use or you can use Sun Native MPXIO
On 8/14/08, Stalin <stalinsk@gmail.com> wrote:Hi All,
Anyone using ASM/clusterware on single databases in a active-passive
configuration. Most of our medium sized customer installations are
single databases in active-passive configuration using sun cluster
data services for automatic fail over. Wondering if we anyone using
ASM in this configuration successfully without the sun cluster part. I
believe you would still need sun cluster for multipathing as ASM
doesn't support it yet.