Re: Sticky bit set on linux password file
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:08:27 -0400
Message-ID: <OFFE1CCC81.571E5FF1-ON85257479.0068ED22-85257479.00692524@lnotes-gw.ent.nwie.net>
so the upper S means that file is NOT set executable even though the
setuid bit is turned on, dang and I thought I've been doing this a long
time but must have missed that one somewhere along the way. I can't for
the life of me figure out the purpose.
Joe
You can have it: Fast, Right or Cheap, pick 2 of the 3. Fast + Right is Expensive
Fast + Cheap will be incorrect.
Right + Cheap will take a while.
"Jared Still" <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
07/01/2008 02:56 PM
Please respond to jkstill_at_gmail.com
From
"Jared Still" <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
To
"Oracle-L Freelists" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Sticky bit set on linux password file
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
The following test was performed:
shutdown database
chmod 640 orapworcl
startup database
logon to database remotely as sysdba
It doesn't appear that the SUID bit serves any purpose.
Does someone here know why the password file is SUID?
I hit SEND just a bit too soon.
After doing that test, I saw that the sticky bit was again set on the
password file.
This occurs during the mount of the controlfile (9.2.0.7 database)
- SQL> startup nomount ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 337609664 bytes
Fixed Size 742336 bytes Variable Size 218103808 bytes Database Buffers 117440512 bytes Redo Buffers 1323008 bytesSQL> !ls -l orapworcl
-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 1536 Oct 30 2007 orapworcl
SQL> alter database mount;
Database altered.
SQL> !ls -l orpworcl
-rwSr----- 1 oracle oinstall 1536 Oct 30 2007 orapwqa01
SQL> So the question still stands - why?
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jul 01 2008 - 14:08:27 CDT