RE: Cluster Interconnects configured in single-instance DB

From: Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak_at_proquest.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:18:40 -0400
Message-ID: <667C10D184B2674A82068E06A78382B51DDE79C1@AAPQMAILBX01V.proque.st>


Hmm....does the single instance database use the same $ORACLE_HOME as the RAC database?

-Mark

--

Mark J. Bobak
Senior Database Administrator, System & Product Technologies ProQuest
789 E. Eisenhower, Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346
+1.734.997.4059 or +1.800.521.0600 x 4059 mark.bobak_at_proquest.com
www.proquest.com
www.csa.com

ProQuest...Start here.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeffery Thomas Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:56 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: Cluster Interconnects configured in single-instance DB

We have a two-node 10.2.0.3 RAC system on Solaris 10 using Oracle Clusterware and ASM that is being used for our test database.. We also have a single-instance database on one node of this cluster being used for development.

The dev database is using ASM, sharing the same data disk group as the RAC database.

I noticed on startup in the alert.log that it is configuring interconnects; in addition, when I perform this query in the single-instance database:

SQL> select * from v$cluster_interconnects;

NAME IP_ADDRESS IS_ SOURCE
--------------- ---------------- --- -------------------------------

e1000g2         192.168.1.103    NO  Oracle Cluster Repository
e1000g5         192.168.1.102    NO  Oracle Cluster Repository

The question I have is:   why?     Is it because it is accessing a
disk group maintained by a clustered ASM?

Thanks,
Jeff
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri Apr 04 2008 - 12:18:40 CDT

Original text of this message