RE: flush shared_pool and query performance
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:15:14 -0500
Message-ID: <OF7D55F2C7.CCDCBFFF-ON86257421.004E126A-86257421.004E4C85@discover.com>
Cursor_sharing is set to exact:
17:31:00 EGUREV1 @dccs05 >show parameter cursor
cursor_sharing string EXACT cursor_space_for_time boolean TRUE open_cursors integer 300 session_cached_cursors integer 50
thank you
Gene Gurevich
"Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen_at_On eNeck.com> To <genegurevich_at_discover.com>, 04/03/2008 06:15 <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> PM cc Subject RE: flush shared_pool and query performance
Do you have the parameter cursor_sharing=similar set?
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of
genegurevich_at_discover.com
Why would the third SQL complete that fast. I have a different SQL because of the value 4567 (and I don't use bind variables), so shouldn't this be a hard parse too?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Apr 04 2008 - 09:15:14 CDT