Trying to understand an ASM discrepancy
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:06:25 -0700
Message-ID: <FE043305B38A0F448F3924429D650C2A071702F6@VEXBE2.ex.ad3.ucdavis.edu>
Greetings,
I am looking at a two node rac cluster running on 32-bit RHEL4, oracle 10.2.0.3.0 SE and am puzzled by a discrepancy in the description of the library and system as listed in the V$ASM_DISK view in the ASM instance. The ASM and RDBMS are installed in separate homes. On node 1 I see the following...
[root_at_spenser init.d]# ./oracleasm listdisks
VOL1
VOL2
VOL3
SQL> select library,path from v$asm_disk order by path;
LIBRARY PATH
System /dev/raw/raw1 System /dev/raw/raw10 System /dev/raw/raw2 System /dev/raw/raw3 System /dev/raw/raw5 System /dev/raw/raw6 System /dev/raw/raw7 System /dev/raw/raw8 System /dev/raw/raw9
On node 2 I see the following...
[root_at_hawk init.d]# ./oracleasm listdisks
VOL1
VOL2
VOL3
SQL> select library,path from v$asm_disk order by path;
LIBRARY PATH
System /dev/raw/raw1 System /dev/raw/raw10 System /dev/raw/raw2 System /dev/raw/raw3 System /dev/raw/raw5 System /dev/raw/raw6 System /dev/raw/raw7 System /dev/raw/raw8 System /dev/raw/raw9
ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL1
ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL2
ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL3 As I understand it when the library is listed as system it means that the asm_diskstring parameter is not set correctly. The puzzling thing is that in the instance on each node it is set to null. The asm_diskgroup parameter is set the same on each node, 'ASMGRP1, ASMGRP2'. I don't understand what might have caused these to differ. If anyone can assist I would appreciate it.
Thanks.
Bill Wagman
Univ. of California at Davis
IET Campus Data Center
wjwagman_at_ucdavis.edu
(530) 754-6208
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Apr 02 2008 - 19:06:25 CDT