RE: gzip vs. compress
From: M Rafiq <rafiq9857_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:04:36 -0500
Message-ID: <BAY107-W15CE9A0AFF45D13DA8C1BBA13E0@phx.gbl>
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging.�You IM, we give. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:04:36 -0500
Message-ID: <BAY107-W15CE9A0AFF45D13DA8C1BBA13E0@phx.gbl>
Gzip is much better than compress. Fast, compressing much better and more reliable for uncompress. Couple of years back I produced comparative results on this list. Only observation is high CPU usage for gzip than compress though.
Regards
Rafiq
From: joe_dba_at_hotmail.comTo: oracle-l_at_freelists.orgSubject: gzip vs. compressDate: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:54:15 -0600
Which is better to use gzip or compress? All of my work is done on AIX 5L 64bit server. I am doing cold backups of databases where I tar and then compress the resulting file. I have always used compress, but I read that gzip gives better compression. Any thoughts will be appreciated.
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more.
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging.�You IM, we give. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jan 22 2008 - 14:04:36 CST