Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster

From: Pedro Espinoza <raindoctor_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:14:42 -0500
Message-ID: <b86c876f0801170514l4e045cc4n8c0069e2c03adb66@mail.gmail.com>

All these third party clusterware vendors sell clusterware along with cluster file systems. If you wanna use their cluster file systems, yes, you need their cluster manager/clusterware to manage the cluster file system. The argument boils down to this: Do you have money to afford their cluster systems? Or do you go with raw/nfs/asm, as oracle recommends?

On Jan 17, 2008 5:09 AM, hrishy <hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> After googling i came across this where the author
> provides compelling arguments to use a third part
> cluster
>
> www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris10/solaris_cluster.pdf
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:14:42 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Burakowski: "Re: All RAC Nodes reboot without log-entry"
Previous message: Ujang Jaenudin: "master node (clusterware layer) - ocfs2 - failover"
In reply to: hrishy: "compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster"
Next in thread: hrishy: "Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster"
Reply: hrishy: "Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message