Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
From: Job Miller <jobmiller_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <928964.95862.qm@web53901.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Jan 08 2008 - 16:29:19 CST
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <928964.95862.qm@web53901.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
this is addressed with pros/cons pretty well here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/pdf/1126_Ray_WP.pdf
stretch clusters, data guard, or remote mirroring
Bob Robert <mssql_2002_at_yahoo.com> wrote: Gurus,
I need your opinion regarding setting up High Availability solution between Primary and Secondary Data Centers. Is it better to go with Oracle RAC or Oracle Standby database.
Thanks In Advance,
Bob
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Jan 08 2008 - 16:29:19 CST