Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: NFS on a 10g RAC cluster
I think I may have stated the problem a bit ambiguously - the intent was
not to store database files on NFS, but rather to host NFS on the same
platform, and let CRS manage and failover the NFS daemons. CRS can be
extended to manage non-Oracle applications. The database is already
built and running via ASM storage to a SAN.
From: Dan Norris [mailto:dannorris_at_dannorris.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:00 PM
To: krish.hariharan_at_quasardb.com; Crisler, Jon
Cc: Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: NFS on a 10g RAC cluster
I'm not a fan of putting Oracle DBs on NFS. Furthermore, as this list
shows:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/clustering/certify/te
ch_generic_unix_new.html, only a relatively small handful of specialized
NFS appliances/software are supported for RAC. That is, you can't take
the typical UNIX NFS server implementation and use it to run RAC in a
supported way. If you don't care about support and just want to build a
sandbox, it may work fine--I've used OpenFiler for sandboxes and it
worked well for my functional (not load) testing.
Dan
Jon,
From discussions with a Unix architect, I understood that read-write nfs has some holes that our security teams did not like. We however use read only nfs routinely in many environments. The issues were: 1. Security did not like us using nfs, especially read-write 2. In our Solaris environments, in some older OS releases, stale nfs mounts were problematic.
A question though: Is there a reason why you wouldn't have the nfs
mounts
on all nodes of the RAC and perhaps control access to that mount point
through, say the services framework as opposed to failing the mount
point
to different nodes?
-Krish
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Dec 10 2007 - 16:03:29 CST
![]() |
![]() |