Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Performance Problem

Re: Performance Problem

From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:27:57 +1100
Message-ID: <4730177D.5010801@iinet.net.au>


Limin Guo wrote,on my timestamp of 6/11/2007 7:14 AM:

> We upgraded Peoplesoft databases from 9.2.0 to Oracle 10.2.0.2
> <http://10.2.0.2> about a year ago. During the testing phase, I found
> that I had to set the following hidden parameter to make the application
> running smoothly. After the 10.2.0.3 <http://10.2.0.3> patchset was
> applied to those databases in , I had not rechecked if any of the
> following parameters need to be adjusted.
>
> *._complex_view_merging=false
> *._gby_hash_aggregation_enabled=FALSE
> *._optimizer_cost_based_transformation='off'
> *._unnest_subquery=false
>

Very hard to say what will work with what, it all depends on which Peopletools release you're on. According to release notes for 8.48.10 there are two mandatory patches to be applied to 10.2.0.3 for that Peopletools release. They don't mention any additional parameters. However, I've found out the hard way that _unnest_subquery is required for most of the custom views at our site. The vanilla standard Peoplesoft code doesn't appear to need it but our custom code certainly does.
I've kept a record of which parameters were added, when and why: it's relatively easy for us to do a regression test and find out if something works well or not. But it doesn't mean it will work with someone else's release levels.

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision_at_iinet.net.au
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Nov 06 2007 - 01:27:57 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US